"Reflecting on the question, 'What could go wrong with the Platform Engineering hype?' inspired me, Steve Fenton earlier this year, to undertake independent research into the business and technical motivations behind Platform Engineering. We’re now one step closer to opening this research for public review"
• Teams are focussing on too few features for a platform, platforms are more successful with more features in general, though precision in feature selection is more important than “trying to do everything”
• The top reason for platform adoption is to “improve efficiency” and cost control is a great practical thing to track to demonstrate progress. A platform that pays for itself is going to have a safe budget over the longer term.
• Talking to platform users regularly (at least monthly, but weekly or daily is better) predicts higher success - user-centricity will not only lead to success but will also keep platforms light as they’ll have fewer unused features.
• There are common themes around deployment pipelines, but the worst outcome from the research would be people creating carbon copies. Some of the top-rated platforms had just 3 features, yet achieved “all goals” for adoption.
Meanwhile I recorded and pushed an episode on #cloudnativefm People, Processes, Power, and Performance with Platform Engineering