This message was deleted.
# intros
s
This message was deleted.
r
Welcome Lex đź‘‹ out of curiosity, what 300 sites and 30 brands mean technically speaking ?
s
Also, Welcome, and also out of curiosity; Is there are reason you prefer Terraform over AWS CDK or Pulumi. It is a decision that we have struggled with as an organization?
y
Welcome Lex. I'm wondering the same as Romaric. Also, I'll be happy to know which components of ArgoCD are you utilizing. It's really a great project, and I think I underutilize it
@Steve Jackson Out of curiosity, have you considered using Terraform CDK ? We have been considering using it since it went GA. I would love to know your thoughts
l
Thank you @Romaric Philogène Great question here is a little intro on the company some companies such as Deciem include 2 brands NIOD and the well know The Ordinary https://www.elcompanies.com/en/who-we-are/at-a-glance among these brands the company sells in 150 countries and each of this require specific compliance , security , language , as well as product recommendation ect.
s
@Yusuf; Terraform CDK is on our radar, indeed. For AWS specific stuff -- it is hard to match the efforts currently being put into AWS-CDK by the community and AWS itself. Specifically in the area of L2 and L3 Constructs -- where you can create entire functional stacks with just a few lines of code. Pulumi offers similar abstraction for non AWS stuff (Auth0, New Relic, PagerDuty, etc.) We don't have any opposition to Terraform CDK, we just don't have a compelling reason to adopt it (we are AWS only.)